MODx versions 1.0.6 and below suffer from cross site request forgery, abuse of functionality, and denial of service vulnerabilities.
06e2431993e324f2e749b37a6e7c7e00a479836f6dfc847e0cea7aa9db329961Hello list!
I want to warn you about new security vulnerabilities in MODx. This is the
second part of the vulnerabilities in this CMS (6 vulnerabilities to
previous 19 vulnerabilities).
These are Cross-Site Request Forgery, Abuse of Functionality, Denial of
Service and Insufficient Anti-automation vulnerabilities in MODx. It's about
0.x and 1.x (Evolution) versions of MODx CMS. In 2.x (Revolution) versions
of MODx there are part of these holes and part of new holes - I've wrote
separate advisory concerning it.
-------------------------
Affected products:
-------------------------
Vulnerable are MODx 1.0.6 and previous versions.
----------
Details:
----------
Cross-Site Request Forgery (WASC-09):
Lack of captcha in login form (http://site/manager/) can be used for
different attacks - for CSRF-attack to login into account (remote login - to
conduct attacks on vulnerabilities inside of account), for automated
entering into account, for phishing and other automated attacks. Which you
can read about in the article "Attacks on unprotected login forms"
(http://lists.webappsec.org/pipermail/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org/2011-April/007773.html).
Bellow mentioned DoS attack is conducting via this CSRF vulnerability.
Abuse of Functionality (Login Enumeration) (WASC-42):
In login form (http://site/manager/) Login Enumeration is possible. If
blocking isn't triggering after three requests (as can be set at the site),
then there is no such login in the system, i.e. the blocking works only for
working logins. The attack is possible, when blocking is turned on.
So by sending three (by default) POST requests per verifiable login, it'll
possible to pick up working logins. To use for attacks on earlier mentioned
Brute Force vulnerability.
Exploit:
<body onLoad="document.hack.submit()">
<form name="hack"
action="http://site/manager/processors/login.processor.php" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="ajax" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="username" value="test">
<input type="hidden" name="password" value="test">
</form>
</body>
Abuse of Functionality (WASC-42):
After finding of login with above-mentioned vulnerability it's possible to
abuse blocking of accounts. After three unsuccessful attempts (as can be set
at the site) the account is blocking (including account of the
administrator). By persistent sending of requests to this functionality (by
three incorrect requests), it's possible to persistently put the account in
blocked state (including account of the administrator).
Exploit:
<body onLoad="document.hack.submit()">
<form name="hack"
action="http://site/manager/processors/login.processor.php" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="ajax" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="username" value="admin">
</form>
</body>
Denial of Service (WASC-10):
At sending of POST request to script
http://site/manager/processors/login.processor.php, he returns to previous
page, which again sends to this script. By this way it creates Looped DoS,
which can overload the server.
About Looped DoS vulnerabilities I've wrote in 2008's articles Looped DoS
and Classification of DoS vulnerabilities in web applications
(http://websecurity.com.ua/2663/) and in 2009's article Redirectors: the
phantom menace
(http://lists.webappsec.org/pipermail/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org/2009-September/005722.html).
According to my articles, for conducting of such DoS attack it's needed to
give users a link to such looped redirect, which will be infinitely sending
requests and overloading a server (in case of MODx it's possible to create
unidirectional and bidirectional Looped DoS). In case of POST request it can
be html form placed on popular site, e.g. in hidden iframe to conduct attack
invisibly and as long as the page with iframe will be opened by users.
Exploit:
<body onLoad="document.hack.submit()">
<form name="hack"
action="http://site/manager/processors/login.processor.php" method="post">
</form>
</body>
Insufficient Anti-automation (WASC-21):
In login form (http://site/manager/) there is no protection against
automated request, which allows to picking up logins (via Abuse of
Functionality vulnerability) in automated way. As to pick up passwords (via
Brute Force vulnerability) for picked up logins in automated way. And also
to conduct automated blocking of revealed accounts.
In password recovery form (http://site/manager/index.php?action=show_form)
there is no protection against automated request, which allows to picking up
e-mails of users in automated way.
------------
Timeline:
------------
2012.06.28 - announced at my site.
2012.06.28 - informed developers about the first part of vulnerabilities.
2012.06.30 - informed developers about the second part of vulnerabilities.
2012.07.28 - informed developers about vulnerabilities in MODx Revolution
and reminded about previous two letters.
2012.07.28-2012.10.31 - during conversation with developers about MODx
Revolution, I was constantly reminding them, that I've sent them info about
holes in Evolution and I can resent them, because it was clear that they
missed it (they only were answering concerning Revolution).
2012.11.02 - after developers said they want to see this information (missed
by them in June), I've resent the first two letters to the developers.
2012.11.24 - disclosed at my site (http://websecurity.com.ua/5929/).
Best wishes & regards,
MustLive
Administrator of Websecurity web site
http://websecurity.com.ua
© 2024 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.
%7Cutmcsr%3D(direct)%7Cutmcmd%3D(none)){kind=small}
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Subscribe to an RSS Feed